<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Frame &#187; film-musical</title>
	<atom:link href="http://frame.the-frame.com/tag/film-musical/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://frame.the-frame.com</link>
	<description>from the pen of Jandy Stone</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 07 Mar 2010 23:17:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Gold Diggers of 1933</title>
		<link>http://frame.the-frame.com/2009/09/21/gold-diggers-of-1933/</link>
		<comments>http://frame.the-frame.com/2009/09/21/gold-diggers-of-1933/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2009 05:58:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jandy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Film]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Film Reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dick Powell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[film-1933]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[film-musical]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[film-United States]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ginger Rogers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gold Diggers of 1933]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Joan Blondell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mervyn LeRoy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ruby Keeler]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Warren William]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frame.the-frame.com/?p=602</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<em>Gold Diggers</em> is both more explicit about and less infused with the Depression than <em>42nd Street</em>. It begins with Ginger Rogers singing "We're in the Money" (which includes lines like "Old Man Depression you are through, you done us wrong" and "we never see a headline about a breadline today"), but it turns out to be a rehearsal that gets interrupted by creditors shutting down the show for lack of payment for the theatre.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="reviewheader">
<img src="http://frame.the-frame.com/wp-content/uploads/gold_diggers_of_1933.jpg" alt="Gold Diggers of 1933" title="Gold Diggers of 1933" height="300" class="reviewposter" /><br />
<strong>Director:</strong> Mervyn LeRoy<br />
<strong>Screenplay:</strong> David Boehm, Ben Markson, Erwin S. Gelsey, James Seymour<br />
<strong>Producer:</strong> Robert Ward, Jack L. Warner<br />
<strong>Starring:</strong> Dick Powell, Ruby Keeler, Joan Blondell, Warren William, Ginger Rogers<br />
<strong>MPAA Rating:</strong> NR<br />
<strong>Running time:</strong> 96min.</p>
<div class="pullquote">Yet even with its silliness, I still have a huge soft spot for <em>Gold Diggers of 1933</em>.</div>
<p><em>Originally posted at <a href="http://www.rowthree.com/2009/07/01/42nd-street-and-gold-diggers-of-1933/">Row Three</a> on 1 July 2009, as part of a double-review with 42nd Street, in a series on the 1930s.</em></p>
<p>[xrr rating=3.5/5]</p>
<div style="clear: both;"> </div>
</div>
<p><img src="http://frame.the-frame.com/wp-content/uploads/vlcsnap-15570378-266x200.png" alt="Gold Diggers of 1933" title="Gold Diggers of 1933" width="266" height="200" class="rightimage" /><em>Gold Diggers</em> is both more explicit about and less infused with the Depression than <em>42nd Street</em>. It begins with Ginger Rogers singing &#8220;We&#8217;re in the Money&#8221; (which includes lines like &#8220;Old Man Depression you are through, you done us wrong&#8221; and &#8220;we never see a headline about a breadline today&#8221;), but it turns out to be a rehearsal that gets interrupted by creditors shutting down the show for lack of payment for the theatre. From there we find three showgirls lamenting how few jobs there are and how they can&#8217;t afford food and clothes &#8211; but their spacious New York apartment is almost less believable than Bebe Daniels&#8217; in <em>42nd Street</em>. After all, these are chorus girls, not established stars.</p>
<p>Anyway, they learn a producer friend is putting on a show and the songwriter (Dick Powell again) across the courtyard somehow has the money to back it, with the caveat that his sweetheart Ruby Keeler (again) play the lead. From there, though, the story sort of devolves into a brief mystery regarding Powell&#8217;s true identity and where his money comes from, and then a REALLY contrived and unbelievable plot involving Keeler&#8217;s friend Joan Blondell (who&#8217;s far better than the material she&#8217;s given) and Powell&#8217;s rich brother, who doesn&#8217;t want Powell to get mixed up with showgirls. It also loses the undercurrent of the Depression, as it focuses on the backstabbing and role-playing and inexplicable falling-in-love of the characters, who start living up to the title of the film even though most of the point is supposed to be that they don&#8217;t.</p>
<p>By the time it&#8217;s over, there are so many unmotivated character shifts and unprovoked decisions that it&#8217;s really better to ignore the plot altogether and focus solely on Busby Berkeley&#8217;s dance routines and the one-off zingers that Blondell, Rogers, and Aline MacMahon can deliver so well. The last number finally remembers that the movie originally wanted to be about the Depression and ties it into the veterans of WWI, lamenting the fact that so many men who fought for their country are now in breadlines. Thankfully, the film ends with the strong visuals and emotion of &#8220;Remember My Forgotten Man&#8221; rather than with any silly pleasantries of the plot.</p>
<p><img src="http://frame.the-frame.com/wp-content/uploads/vlcsnap-15574349-266x200.png" alt="Gold Diggers of 1933" title="Gold Diggers of 1933" width="266" height="200" class="leftimage" />Yet even with its silliness, I still have a huge soft spot for <em>Gold Diggers of 1933</em>. Maybe it&#8217;s Ginger singing in Pig Latin, or dialogue exchanges like &#8220;If Barney could see ME in clothes&#8230;&#8221; / &#8220;He wouldn&#8217;t recognize you!&#8221;  Or maybe it&#8217;s the shameless extravagance of Berkeley&#8217;s choreography, which would never fit on an actual stage &#8211; the routines are actually quite a bit better and more polished here than in <em>42nd Street</em>. Or maybe it&#8217;s Warner Bros&#8217; willingness to keep harping on the Depression, however sporadically and unevenly, and allow Harry Warren and Al Dubin to pen minor-keyed songs about it rather than allow people to just pretend everything&#8217;s all hunky-dory for a couple of hours in a cinema.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://frame.the-frame.com/2009/09/21/gold-diggers-of-1933/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>42nd Street</title>
		<link>http://frame.the-frame.com/2009/09/21/42nd-street/</link>
		<comments>http://frame.the-frame.com/2009/09/21/42nd-street/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2009 05:41:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jandy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Film]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Film Reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[42nd Street]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bebe Daniels]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Busby Berkeley]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dick Powell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[film-1933]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[film-musical]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[film-United States]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[George Brent]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ruby Keeler]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Warner Baxter]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frame.the-frame.com/?p=594</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<em>42nd Street</em> works because it has a vitality and freshness that actually revitalized the musical as a cinematic form. It works because choreographer Busby Berkeley is a genius of some sort. And it works because of its inspired mix of cynicism and optimism that could perhaps only come out of the Depression.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="reviewheader">
<img src="http://frame.the-frame.com/wp-content/uploads/forty_second_street.jpg" alt="42nd Street" title="42nd Street" height="300" class="reviewposter" /><br />
<strong>Director:</strong> Lloyd Bacon<br />
<strong>Screenplay:</strong> Rian James and James Seymour<br />
<strong>Producer:</strong> Darryl F. Zanuck<br />
<strong>Starring:</strong> Warner Baxter, Bebe Daniels, George Brent, Ruby Keeler, Dick Powell<br />
<strong>MPAA Rating:</strong> NR<br />
<strong>Running time:</strong> 89min.</p>
<div class="pullquote">&#8220;The big parade goes on for years; it&#8217;s the rhapsody of laughter and tears. Naughty, bawdy, gaudy, sporty, 42nd Street.&#8221;</div>
<p><em>Originally posted at <a href="http://www.rowthree.com/2009/07/01/42nd-street-and-gold-diggers-of-1933/">Row Three</a> on 1 July 2009, as a double review with <i>Gold Diggers of 1933</i> in a series about the 1930s.</em></p>
<p>[xrr rating=4.5/5]</p>
<div style="clear: both;"> </div>
</div>
<p><em>42nd Street</em> isn&#8217;t known as the granddaddy of backstage movies for nothing &#8211; it opens with word spreading around Broadway that famed director Julian Marsh (Warner Baxter) is putting on a show, continues through auditions and rehearsals, setbacks and last-minute casting changes, and finishes with the opening night extravaganza.</p>
<p>Marsh is just recovering from a nervous breakdown, and this show may be his comeback or his downfall. He&#8217;s really the central character of the story, though he&#8217;s surrounded by a large supporting cast: Ruby Keeler as the bright-faced wanna-be chorus girl, Dick Powell as the peppy juvenile actor, Bebe Daniels as the big star who brings the money to the show in the form of infatuated checkbook-weilder Guy Kibbee, George Brent as the man who threatens the show by coming between Daniels and Kibbee, and Ginger Rogers and Una Merkel as the wisecracking comic relief. There&#8217;s a lot going on, and a lot of subplots, but it all holds together rather better than you&#8217;d expect.</p>
<p><img src="http://frame.the-frame.com/wp-content/uploads/vlcsnap-15598432-266x200.png" alt="42nd Street" title="42nd Street" width="266" height="200" class="leftimage" />But let&#8217;s make sure we&#8217;re a little honest here. <span class="movie">42nd Street</span> isn&#8217;t a great movie because it has a cast full of great actors. Warner Baxter holds it together dramatically as Marsh, and Rogers and Merkel keep it sarcastically funny, but no one else can act at all. It&#8217;s not even a great movie because it has the best singing and dancing ever &#8211; Keeler made a lot of tap-dancing movies in her time, and compared to, say, the dancers in 1920s movies, she&#8217;s not bad, but just wait until Ginger actually got some real dancing parts, or Eleanor Powell started hoofing at MGM. That spelled the end for the relatively heavy-footed Keeler.</p>
<p><em>42nd Street</em> works because it has a vitality and freshness that actually revitalized the musical as a cinematic form. It works because choreographer Busby Berkeley is a genius of some sort. You can&#8217;t really call a lot of what he does dancing &#8211; it&#8217;s more like geometric manipulation that has to be seen from the top or bottom or other views that could not possibly exist in an actual live theatre, but that&#8217;s just the thing. He liberated the cinema musical from its dependence on stage-bound design. And it works because of its inspired mix of cynicism and optimism that could perhaps only come out of the Depression.</p>
<p><img src="http://frame.the-frame.com/wp-content/uploads/vlcsnap-15600420-266x200.png" alt="42nd Street" title="42nd Street" width="266" height="200" class="rightimage" />It&#8217;s not five minutes into the movie that Bebe Daniels tells her wanna-be lover/investor that she can&#8217;t have her pick of shows, &#8220;not with this Depression,&#8221; but the thought is belied by her incredibly large and well-appointed apartment. Later, Marsh gives Keeler (who predictably gets bumped up from the chorus into a leading role) a pep talk largely based around how many jobs would be lost if she fails to win over the audience. Though the characters don&#8217;t constantly harp on the Depression verbally, it&#8217;s sort of a background constant, and the climactic title number &#8211; a mini-story in itself, though not as epic as some of Berkeley&#8217;s later extravaganzas &#8211; brings out the desperate mood of the times with its minor key, depictions of murder and death, and yet gives a sense of the vibrant life that continues and will continue as long as Broadway itself stands. As the song goes: &#8220;The big parade goes on for years; it&#8217;s the rhapsody of laughter and tears. Naughty, bawdy, gaudy, sporty, 42nd Street.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://frame.the-frame.com/2009/09/21/42nd-street/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Hairspray</title>
		<link>http://frame.the-frame.com/2008/02/23/hairspray/</link>
		<comments>http://frame.the-frame.com/2008/02/23/hairspray/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Feb 2008 03:27:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jandy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Capsule Reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Adam Shankman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[film-2007]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[film-musical]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[film-United States]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hairspray]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Travolta]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michelle Pfeiffer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Queen Latifah]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Zac Efron]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frame.the-frame.com/?p=161</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I think what I’m reaching for is that it’s calculating and manipulative and predictable, but saying that feels like raining on some kid’s birthday.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href='http://frame.the-frame.com/wp-content/uploads/hairspray.jpg'><img src="http://frame.the-frame.com/wp-content/uploads/hairspray-67x100.jpg" alt="" title="hairspray" width="67" height="100" style="margin: 0px 0px 0px 10px" align="right" /></a>Here’s what I wrote in my movie-watching file immediately after seeing <em>Hairspray</em>: “Infectious fun, but I also feel like it’s making me cynical, by a weird twist of reverse psychology. I think what I’m reaching for is that it’s calculating and manipulative and predictable, but saying that feels like raining on some kid’s birthday.” I still feel sort of that way. It was pretty much impossible not to enjoy it while I was watching it, but it took me a while to get rid of the saccharine aftertaste. Travolta is a joke, and Walken doesn’t help him out much. Blonsky, of course, put her all into it, and it’s worth watching for her and Michelle Pfeiffer, who’s delightfully wicked. The music is good, but I wish the dancing had been better. And I’m sorry, I don’t normally mind populism, but Adam Shankman is aggressively populist with no more vision than trying to please as many people as he can and offend as few as possible. There’s no art and little of interest in that, as was blatantly obvious in his choreography for <em>So You Think You Can Dance</em> last summer, which paled so much in comparison to Mia Michaels and Wade Robson that it’s best if we just try to forget it. I was, however, impressed by the racial issues addressed, something I wasn’t expecting. So I’ll bump my rating up a notch for that, and for Queen Latifah’s nuanced performance in a movie which is anything but nuanced.<br />
<b>Above Average</b></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://frame.the-frame.com/2008/02/23/hairspray/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Sweeney Todd: The Demon Barber of Fleet Street</title>
		<link>http://frame.the-frame.com/2008/02/23/sweeney-todd-the-demon-barber-of-fleet-street/</link>
		<comments>http://frame.the-frame.com/2008/02/23/sweeney-todd-the-demon-barber-of-fleet-street/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Feb 2008 01:40:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jandy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Capsule Reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[film-2007]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[film-drama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[film-musical]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[film-United States]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Helena Bonham Carter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Johnny Depp]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sweeney Todd: The Demon Barber of Fleet Street]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tim Burton]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frame.the-frame.com/?p=148</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Basically, though, Burton’s direction and the gorgeous art design were the real stars for me.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href='http://frame.the-frame.com/wp-content/uploads/sweeney_todd.jpg'><img src="http://frame.the-frame.com/wp-content/uploads/sweeney_todd-67x100.jpg" alt="" title="sweeney_todd" width="67" height="100" style="margin: 0px 0px 0px 10px" align="right" /></a>I haven’t seen the show, but when I heard about the magical combination of Tim Burton+Johnny Depp+Helena Bonham Carter+Steven Sondheim, I was pretty much as excited as could be. And again, not having seen the show, I really wasn’t a bit disappointed. Burton had me from the initial flythrough his stylized London, Depp can sing better than I expected, and Bonham Carter’s blend of humor and humanity added a lot of depth. And Sondheim, oh Sondheim. I’m not sure I’m willing to replace <em>Into the Woods</em> as my favorite Sondheim musical yet, but still. He’s incredible. I will admit that I was not quite prepared for the cannibalism, but the song that accompanies it is utterly delicious (couldn’t help it, sorry). The film isn’t perfect, though–as many accolades as Depp has been getting, his performance struck me as a bit cold; Todd’s meant to be single-minded and obsessive, of course, but I would’ve liked to have seen a shimmer or two of Benjamin Barker. Maybe when I rewatch and can focus on more than absorbing the story I’ll see more in his performance. Basically, though, Burton’s direction and the gorgeous art design were the real stars for me.<br />
<b>Well Above Average</b></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://frame.the-frame.com/2008/02/23/sweeney-todd-the-demon-barber-of-fleet-street/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>All That Jazz</title>
		<link>http://frame.the-frame.com/2008/02/23/all-that-jazz/</link>
		<comments>http://frame.the-frame.com/2008/02/23/all-that-jazz/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Feb 2008 01:37:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jandy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Capsule Reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All That Jazz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ann Reinking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bob Fosse]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[film-1979]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[film-drama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[film-musical]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[film-United States]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Roy Scheider]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frame.the-frame.com/?p=147</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It’s very powerful on a narrative level, but even better, it’s the best opportunity many of us will have to see Fosse choreography performed under his supervision, and to see his long-time partner Ann Reinking dance.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href='http://frame.the-frame.com/wp-content/uploads/all_that_jazz.jpg'><img src="http://frame.the-frame.com/wp-content/uploads/all_that_jazz-67x100.jpg" alt="" title="all_that_jazz" width="67" height="100" style="margin: 0px 0px 0px 10px" align="right" /></a>Bob Fosse is a truly a triple threat in the world of show business movies. He’s an excellent dancer, an incredible and groundbreaking choreographer, and a very fine director. He doesn’t appear in <em>All That Jazz</em>, which sort of eliminates the first one, but Joe Gideon as a character is a stand-in for Fosse in the pseudo-autobiographical story. Gideon is a charismatic, highly-strung Broadway director/choreographer who is also working on making a film. The film is not going well, nor is his love life (his ex-wife is working in his current play, while his long-time girlfriend is constantly wishing he didn’t pay so much attention to the chorus line), and soon his overextended lifestyle catches up with him. Meanwhile his inner turmoil and boundless creativity explodes in dance number after dance number, notably the rehearsal scene involving a risque number that has the show backers sighing “Well, there goes the family audience,” and the series of dream/hallucinogenic dances that accompany his impending death. It’s very powerful on a narrative level, but even better, it’s the best opportunity many of us will have to see Fosse choreography performed under his supervision, and to see his long-time partner Ann Reinking dance. Fosse melded the Broadway dance style with ballet and jazz more completely than anyone else has before or since; his style may take some getting used to–it’s built on nuance and minimalism rather than showiness–but it’s well worth it, and the more I see of it, the more impressed I get.<br />
<b>Superior</b></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://frame.the-frame.com/2008/02/23/all-that-jazz/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Across the Universe</title>
		<link>http://frame.the-frame.com/2007/11/13/across-the-universe/</link>
		<comments>http://frame.the-frame.com/2007/11/13/across-the-universe/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Nov 2007 16:55:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jandy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Capsule Reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Across the Universe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Evan Rachel Wood]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[film-2007]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[film-musical]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[film-United States]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jim Sturgess]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Julie Taymor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Beatles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vietnam War]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frame.the-frame.com/?p=199</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Julie Taymor uses Beatles songs (many, many Beatles songs) to hold together her story of a working class Liverpool boy (Jude) who comes to America in the 1960s and meets and falls for preppy teenager Lucy. When her brother is drafted for Vietnam, the film takes a decidedly political turn and Jude and Lucy’s relationship [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Julie Taymor uses Beatles songs (many, many Beatles songs) to hold together her story of a working class Liverpool boy (Jude) who comes to America in the 1960s and meets and falls for preppy teenager Lucy. When her brother is drafted for Vietnam, the film takes a decidedly political turn and Jude and Lucy’s relationship is tested by Lucy’s devotion to the anti-war cause. Along the way are plenty of psychadelic detours and sweet duets. Basically, the entire Beatles oevre is covered, from the rollicking early 60s hits to the LCD-infused late 60s and political/philosophical 70s, which is great if a little on the gimmicky side. This film has split critics as much as any this year, and it’s easy to see why. It isn’t completely successful, largely because Taymor can’t decide what she wants to do with the political elements–she’s clearly anti-war, but she also appears to be anti-protest. Which could actually be the case, since an appeal to “All You Need is Love” appears to desire an alternative to violence perpetrated by both pro- and anti-war advocates; still, such a solution is pat at best. Still, even if Taymor doesn’t quite achieve her goals here (if indeed, we can discern her goals), there’s so much about the film that’s just plain enjoyable and enough that’s deliciously risky that it’s hard to deny it was worth trying. Generally, I’d say that a gutsy attempt at art is much better than staying safe and avoiding risk. Taymor has certainly made that attempt, and I applaud her for it.<br />
<strong>Well Above Average</strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://frame.the-frame.com/2007/11/13/across-the-universe/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Hum Dil De Chuke Sanam</title>
		<link>http://frame.the-frame.com/2007/09/14/hum-dil-de-chuke-sanam/</link>
		<comments>http://frame.the-frame.com/2007/09/14/hum-dil-de-chuke-sanam/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Sep 2007 14:18:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jandy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Capsule Reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Aishwarya Rai]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ajay Devgan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bollywood]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[film-1999]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[film-drama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[film-India]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[film-musical]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hum Dil De Chuke Sanam]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[romance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Salman Khan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sanjay Leela Bhansali]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frame.the-frame.com/?p=267</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You have to synopsize Bollywood films in two parts, because really, they’re all two movies mashed up into one. The first half of Hum Dil De Chuke Sanam concerns Sameer (Salman Khan) coming to visit Nandini’s (Aishwarya Rai) family and the two of them falling in love; unfortunately, Nandini’s father has already arranged for her [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You have to synopsize Bollywood films in two parts, because really, they’re all two movies mashed up into one. The first half of <em>Hum Dil De Chuke Sanam</em> concerns Sameer (Salman Khan) coming to visit Nandini’s (Aishwarya Rai) family and the two of them falling in love; unfortunately, Nandini’s father has already arranged for her to marry Vanraj (Ajay Devgan), a man Nandini has hardly met. Unwilling to go against her family’s wishes, she marries Vanraj and Sameer returns to his home in Europe. In the second half, Vanraj realizes that Nandini isn’t going to be happy with him and takes her to Europe to try to find Sameer. I’m going to give away the ending, because it’s the part that conflicts me. After seeing how much Vanraj cares about her (enough to give her up to another man if necessary for her happiness), and how everything he does is for her, she ultimately decides to remain with him even after they locate Sameer. Now, I had made a similar move during the film, and by the end I was rooting for Vanraj, too. Add in my general belief that marriages should stay together, and I was initially very pleased by the outcome. However, when I thought about it more, I became a little bit concerned by the way Nandini phrased her refusal to reunite with Sameer as a duty she owed to Vanraj and her family rather than a true realignment of her love to Vanraj. Now, this is all tied up with Indian culture, too, and I think my discomfort stems from the sense that the film is portraying “if you’re a good Indian girl, you should end up obeying your male superiors because that’s your duty as a woman.” It’s much more complicated than that, because Vanraj really is a better man than Sameer, but I’m not convinced Nandini really recognized that when she made her decision. It’s also complicated by the fact that her marriage with Vanraj was never consummated, so I don’t have quite the moral/ethical commitment to the marriage that I otherwise might. In other words, I think she made the right decision given the individuals in question, but I think she made it for the wrong reason–a reason that reinforces India’s sense of patriarchy in a negative way. As a film experience, it’s not the best Indian film I’ve seen, but I did enjoy it quite a bit.<br />
<strong>Above Average</strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://frame.the-frame.com/2007/09/14/hum-dil-de-chuke-sanam/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Once</title>
		<link>http://frame.the-frame.com/2007/09/04/once/</link>
		<comments>http://frame.the-frame.com/2007/09/04/once/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Sep 2007 17:19:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jandy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Capsule Reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[film-2006]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[film-Ireland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[film-musical]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Glen Hansard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Carney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marketa Irglova]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[musicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Once]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[romance]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frame.the-frame.com/?p=252</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Once is an Irish film about a Dublin man working in his dad’s vacuum repairshop by day but spends his nights performing as a street musician, hoping to eventually record a demo CD. He meets a Czech woman one night, and they become friends–turns out she’s also a musician and they team up to record [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>Once </em>is an Irish film about a Dublin man working in his dad’s vacuum repairshop by day but spends his nights performing as a street musician, hoping to eventually record a demo CD. He meets a Czech woman one night, and they become friends–turns out she’s also a musician and they team up to record the demo. It would be common for the film to turn into a romance at this point, but it doesn’t….really….and that’s actually incredibly refreshing. <em>Once </em>doesn’t follow any of the standard moviemaking formulas–there’s too much music, there’s no sex, there’s no great conflict–and yet it works tremendously well. It’s joyful, it’s fresh, it’s bittersweet, it&#8217;s perfect.<br />
<b>Superior</b></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://frame.the-frame.com/2007/09/04/once/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Second Chorus</title>
		<link>http://frame.the-frame.com/2007/06/22/second-chorus/</link>
		<comments>http://frame.the-frame.com/2007/06/22/second-chorus/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jun 2007 17:05:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jandy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Capsule Reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Burgess Meredith]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[college]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[film-1940]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[film-comedy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[film-musical]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[film-United States]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fred Astaire]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[H.C. Potter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[musicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Paulette Goddard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Second Chorus]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frame.the-frame.com/?p=336</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Second-rate vehicle for Fred Astaire. He and Burgess Meredith play college buddies (note that Astaire was in his forties at the time) who play together in a band. When both of them are forced to graduate–apparently they’ve been failing on purpose to continue getting lucrative college engagements–they both go after a spot in Artie Shaw’s [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Second-rate vehicle for Fred Astaire. He and Burgess Meredith play college buddies (note that Astaire was in his forties at the time) who play together in a band. When both of them are forced to graduate–apparently they’ve been failing on purpose to continue getting lucrative college engagements–they both go after a spot in Artie Shaw’s orchestra. Along to help is Paulette Goddard, who becomes their manager and the wedge that drives them apart, as they both fall in love with her. There’s some good music from Shaw, if you like big band, far too little dancing from Fred, and a believability factor of around 0.5. I didn’t hate it; there’s not enough there to hate.<br />
<strong>Below Average</strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://frame.the-frame.com/2007/06/22/second-chorus/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Dreamgirls</title>
		<link>http://frame.the-frame.com/2007/04/12/dreamgirls/</link>
		<comments>http://frame.the-frame.com/2007/04/12/dreamgirls/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Apr 2007 19:31:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jandy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Capsule Reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Beyonce Knowles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bill Condon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dreamgirls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Eddie Murphy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[film-2006]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[film-musical]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[film-United States]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jamie Foxx]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jennifer Hudson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[show business]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frame.the-frame.com/?p=360</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is something of style over substance, in that the story is fairly routine (despite being based on the real life story of the Supremes; sometimes real life is routine)–a girl group in the sixties makes it big after leaving behind its strongest singer for image reasons, but was it worth it? We all know [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is something of style over substance, in that the story is fairly routine (despite being based on the real life story of the Supremes; sometimes real life is routine)–a girl group in the sixties makes it big after leaving behind its strongest singer for image reasons, but was it worth it? We all know the answer already. But that’s okay, because not having to worry about the story leaves us more time to enjoy the music. And if you like Broadway-inflected Motown-style music, it’s really really good. Eddie Murphy continues to annoy me, but Jamie Foxx does well in his somewhat thankless role, and American Idol-alum Jennifer Hudson completely outshines everyone else in the cast, including Beyonce, going on to win a well-deserved Oscar. (My favorite <em>Dreamgirls</em>-related story is how Beyonce’s father was completely upset when Beyonce didn’t win the Golden Globe for Best Actress, and he claimed it was because the Hollywood Foreign Press were racist–in an awards year when they gave Golden Globes to Jennifer Hudson, Forrest Whitaker, and Eddie Murphy, the Best Musical/Comedy statuette to <em>Dreamgirls</em>, and Beyonce lost out to freakin’ Meryl Streep.)<br />
<strong>Well Above Average</strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://frame.the-frame.com/2007/04/12/dreamgirls/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

