<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Frame &#187; Woody Allen</title>
	<atom:link href="http://frame.the-frame.com/tag/woody-allen/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://frame.the-frame.com</link>
	<description>from the pen of Jandy Stone</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 07 Mar 2010 23:17:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Vicky Cristina Barcelona</title>
		<link>http://frame.the-frame.com/2008/08/14/vicky-cristina-barcelona/</link>
		<comments>http://frame.the-frame.com/2008/08/14/vicky-cristina-barcelona/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Aug 2008 20:24:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jandy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Film Reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[film-2008]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[film-drama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[film-United States]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Javier Bardem]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Penelope Cruz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rebecca Hall]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scarlett Johansson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vicky Cristina Barcelona]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Woody Allen]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frame.the-frame.com/?p=420</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Leaving New York for London with <em>Match Point</em> revitalized Woody Allen’s career in 2005; now he picks up shop again, this time seeking inspiration in Spain. And again, the move does him good, as <em>Vicky Cristina Barcelona</em> evokes, though perhaps does not quite equal, his greatest triumphs.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.the-frame.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/08/vicky_cristina_barcelona-202x300.jpg" alt="Vicky Cristina Barcelona poster" align="right" />Leaving New York for London with <em>Match Point</em> revitalized Woody Allen’s career in 2005; now he picks up shop again, this time seeking inspiration in Spain. And again, the move does him good, as <em>Vicky Cristina Barcelona</em> evokes, though perhaps does not quite equal, his greatest triumphs. Best friends Vicky (Rebecca Hall) and Cristina (Scarlett Johansson) head to Barcelona for a couple of months of study and adventure. Vicky, solidly sure of herself and preparing to marry stably but not imaginatively, plans to finish her thesis on Catalan Identity while Cristina, intense and impulsive, seeks new experiences and passions without really knowing what, if anything, would satisfy her.</p>
<p>All this is revealed in the first five minutes via voice-over narration, a device you’ll probably have a love-hate relationship with. In the beginning, I wished Woody would show more and tell less, but as the film progressed, the narration took on a very dry, ironic tone that I found delightful. Anyway, when painter Juan Antonio (Javier Bardem) turns up and invites both girls for a weekend in his home town, the setup is fairly obvious &#8211; stability vs. passion. Complicating his attraction to Vicky and Cristina is the fact that he’s still completely in love with his ex-wife Maria Elena (Penélope Cruz), even though their relationship ended by her stabbing him. Or did it?</p>
<p>Let me get my few negatives out of the way first. Juan Antonio is a dog &#8211; he propositions everybody within five minutes of talking to them. Once he’s in a steady relationship, he’s a great guy, but I wish Allen had come up with a better way to say “hey, this guy is passionate” than having him try to get everyone into bed immediately. Patricia Clarkson is wasted in her role of an older woman unsatisfied in her stable marriage whose job basically is to try to get Vicky to leave her fiance Doug (Chris Messina) to pursue Juan Antonio. And the ending leaves us not very much different from the beginning, unsure how the Barcelona experience has changed our characters. I’m not wholly inclined to see the last thing as a negative, though. Often such experiences don’t immediately make their effects known, and leaving it to each audience member to decide how Vicky, Cristina, Juan Antonio, Maria Elena, and Doug will ultimately be affected may be a shrewd move on Woody’s part. And nitpicky thing &#8211; hold the dang camera still! There’s barely a shot that isn’t panning or pushing or pulling or tracking. This complaint was perhaps intensified by my recent reading of David Bordwell’s <em>The Way Hollywood Tells It</em>, which talks a lot about the growing use of the “roving camera,” which made me notice it a lot more than I probably otherwise would’ve.</p>
<p>Okay, back to the good parts. Woody’s most solid script in years balances drama and comedy very well, keeping away from extremes of silliness (cf. <em>Scoop </em>or <em>Broadway Danny Rose</em>) and seriousness (cf. <em>Match Point</em> or <em>Interiors</em>). That’s not to say he doesn’t do the extremes well, but I tend to find him most enjoyable and memorable when he does dramatic stories tinged with wit throughout, as in my favorites, <em>Manhattan </em>and <em>Hannah and Her Sisters</em>. While I wouldn’t raise <em>Vicky Cristina Barcelona</em> to those dizzying heights, it’s back on track.</p>
<p>In addition, the cast handles the script with perfect timing, both verbally and physically. When Rebecca Hall appeared in <em>The Prestige</em> as Christian Bale’s long-suffering wife, I found her far more compelling than Scarlett Johansson, who had the larger role of mistress to both Bale and Hugh Jackman. Reteamed here, Hall again outshines her flashier costar. She’s one to watch for in the future; I’ve yet to be unimpressed with her. Johansson can be uneven, but here she matches her performance to the ensemble nicely. You’ll forget all about Bardem’s menacing Anton Chigurh as he infuses Juan Antonio with warmth and humor. And Penélope Cruz owns the screen every second she’s on it (and many that she’s not). The many explosions of laughter from the audience were all deserved equally by the script, the actors, and even the editing at one particular point.</p>
<p>Finally, a word about the relationships, which all end up better in threes than twos &#8211; couples needing a third person to balance out. This goes to extremes with Cristina, Juan Antonio and Maria Elena, but the same concept appears with Juan Antonio-Cristina-Vicky, Cristina-Vicky-Doug, abortively with Maria Elena-Juan Antonio-Vicky, and even perhaps with the titular Vicky-Cristina-Barcelona. At one level, the threesome activity seems like Woody’s own fantasies playing out (admittedly, in a rather tame fashion &#8211; there’s a lot of sex going on in this PG-13 film, but it’s pretty much all offscreen and termed “going to bed together”). But the shifting relationship triangle is not an uncommon literary device, particularly noticable in Alice Walker’s <em>The Color Purple</em>, in which virtually all the relationships form shifting triangles. I’m not sure how far to take Allen’s use of the theme, but the idea seems to be that each person needs two people in their lives &#8211; one more passionate/emotional and one more stable/rational than themselves. But the film expounds no such obvious message, which is a plus for me.</p>
<p>Juan Antonio’s father is a poet who refuses to publish his work as a way of getting back at a world he doesn’t like &#8211; denying the world the things of beauty he creates. It’s impossible to apply that maxim to Allen, who has compulsively shared his work, beautiful and not, with the world nearly every year since 1972. The good is well worth putting up with the less-good, and hopefully <em>Vicky Cristina Barcelona</em> is a sign of more future beautifully-made films from him. Also, Barcelona? Gorgeous. I want to go now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://frame.the-frame.com/2008/08/14/vicky-cristina-barcelona/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Radio Days</title>
		<link>http://frame.the-frame.com/2008/02/23/radio-days/</link>
		<comments>http://frame.the-frame.com/2008/02/23/radio-days/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Feb 2008 02:05:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jandy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Capsule Reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[film-1987]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[film-comedy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[film-United States]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Julie Kavner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mia Farrow]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Radio Days]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Seth Green]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Woody Allen]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frame.the-frame.com/?p=155</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This essentially plotless Woody Allen film consists of a series of nostalgic vignettes about a 1940s working class New York family.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://frame.the-frame.com/wp-content/uploads/radio_days.jpg"><img src="http://frame.the-frame.com/wp-content/uploads/radio_days-67x100.jpg" alt="" title="radio_days" style="margin: 0px 0px 0px 10px;" align="right" height="100" width="67"></a>This essentially plotless Woody Allen film consists of a series of nostalgic vignettes about a 1940s working class New York family. The title comes from their love for the radio, the center of pop culture at the time; the radio also provides the subplot following Mia Farrow as a wanna-be radio singer who gets mixed up with gangsters. Like <em>Broadway Danny Rose</em>, it’s not particularly deep, but it’s also very enjoyable. Having Allen only doing the voiceover (his alter-ego character is a played by a very young Seth Green) is probably a good thing.<br />
<b>Above Average</b></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://frame.the-frame.com/2008/02/23/radio-days/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Interiors</title>
		<link>http://frame.the-frame.com/2008/01/05/interiors/</link>
		<comments>http://frame.the-frame.com/2008/01/05/interiors/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Jan 2008 03:12:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jandy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Capsule Reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Diane Keaton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[film-1978]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[film-drama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[film-United States]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Interiors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Woody Allen]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frame.the-frame.com/?p=191</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In case anyone doubted Woody Allen’s admiration for Ingmar Bergman, he made this film to prove it (I suppose his use of Smiles of a Summer Night as basis for A Midsummer Night’s Sex Comedy also counts). Interiors is about the best imitation of a Bergman chamber drama you could ask for, down to the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In case anyone doubted Woody Allen’s admiration for Ingmar Bergman, he made this film to prove it (I suppose his use of <em>Smiles of a Summer Night</em> as basis for <em>A Midsummer Night’s Sex Comedy</em> also counts). <em>Interiors</em> is about the best imitation of a Bergman chamber drama you could ask for, down to the spare set design, strained family relations, and a climax involving an angry sea. Still, it is also very much Allen’s film–his first straight drama–focusing on deeply neurotic, introspective characters unable to get outside their own heads for long enough to form really true relationships. The mother in the film tries to control her interior life and that of her family in the same way that she controls her living spaces as an interior designer, from whence comes the title. Allen is a bit more didactic in the explanation of that theme than Bergman would have been, but hey. That’s why it’s an Allen film rather than a Bergman one, right?<br />
<strong>Well Above Average</strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://frame.the-frame.com/2008/01/05/interiors/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Broadway Danny Rose</title>
		<link>http://frame.the-frame.com/2008/01/05/broadway-danny-rose/</link>
		<comments>http://frame.the-frame.com/2008/01/05/broadway-danny-rose/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Jan 2008 02:39:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jandy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Capsule Reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Broadway Danny Rose]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[film-1987]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[film-comedy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[film-United States]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mia Farrow]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Woody Allen]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frame.the-frame.com/?p=177</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In this lesser Woody Allen film, Danny Rose (Woody) is a theatrical agent whose clients always leave him when they start becoming successful. His current client, a has-been tenor trying to make a comeback, gives him further grief by having an affair with a young woman (Mia Farrow) with gangster connections. Not only does Danny [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In this lesser Woody Allen film, Danny Rose (Woody) is a theatrical agent whose clients always leave him when they start becoming successful. His current client, a has-been tenor trying to make a comeback, gives him further grief by having an affair with a young woman (Mia Farrow) with gangster connections. Not only does Danny worry about the tenor’s wife, he also gets himself in trouble with the woman’s family. Farrow is fun as she imitates a gangster moll, but there’s not really enough to the story to make the film more than mildly entertaining.<br />
<b>Average</b></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://frame.the-frame.com/2008/01/05/broadway-danny-rose/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Crimes and Misdemeanors</title>
		<link>http://frame.the-frame.com/2007/10/09/crimes-and-misdemeanors/</link>
		<comments>http://frame.the-frame.com/2007/10/09/crimes-and-misdemeanors/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Oct 2007 17:14:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jandy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Capsule Reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Anjelica Huston]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Crimes and Misdemeanors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[film-1989]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[film-drama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[film-United States]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Martin Landau]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Woody Allen]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frame.the-frame.com/?p=251</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This movie has been recommended to me more than any other Woody Allen film, I think. One main plot thread involves Martin Landau’s attempts to get rid of a long-term mistress when she threatens to reveal their affair if he doesn’t marry her; the other follows Allen’s attempts to retain his integrity when the documentary [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This movie has been recommended to me more than any other Woody Allen film, I think. One main plot thread involves Martin Landau’s attempts to get rid of a long-term mistress when she threatens to reveal their affair if he doesn’t marry her; the other follows Allen’s attempts to retain his integrity when the documentary he wants to make about a philosopher gets derailed in favor of a profile of a successful television executive. The threads intersect thematically more than physically, and I honestly don’t feel qualified to discuss the themes after only one viewing. There is so much going on, and most of it is not on the surface. It’s definitely one of Woody’s best, and I hope to return to it many times.<br />
<strong>Superior</strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://frame.the-frame.com/2007/10/09/crimes-and-misdemeanors/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Hannah and Her Sisters</title>
		<link>http://frame.the-frame.com/2007/10/09/hannah-and-her-sisters/</link>
		<comments>http://frame.the-frame.com/2007/10/09/hannah-and-her-sisters/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Oct 2007 16:16:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jandy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Capsule Reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dianne Wiest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[film-1986]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[film-drama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[film-United States]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hannah and Her Sisters]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mia Farrow]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michael Caine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Woody Allen]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frame.the-frame.com/?p=246</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[For whatever reason, I’ve been in a Woody Allen mood lately, rewatching Manhattan and some of my other favorites. I can’t always decide what I think about Allen as a filmmaker, largely because what I think of him as an actor keeps getting in the way (to be clear, I don’t think much of him [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For whatever reason, I’ve been in a Woody Allen mood lately, rewatching <em>Manhattan </em>and some of my other favorites. I can’t always decide what I think about Allen as a filmmaker, largely because what I think of him as an actor keeps getting in the way (to be clear, I don’t think much of him as an actor). It took <em>Hannah and Her Sisters</em> about twelve minutes to become my favorite Woody Allen film. It’s witty but not silly, warm but not maudlin, deep but not pretentious, neurotic but not annoying. It’s got most of the qualities Woody is known for without the excess of them that he often falls into. It’s wonderful, and THIS is what Allen needs to remember how to do if he ever wants to regain his reputation and success (he’s done it to some degree with <em>Match Point</em>, but <em>Hannah </em>is so far superior to <em>Match Point</em> it’s hardly a competition). Whether you like Allen or hate him, don’t give up on him without seeing this.<br />
<strong>Superior</strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://frame.the-frame.com/2007/10/09/hannah-and-her-sisters/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

